Firm knowledge & cases

The second matter should be cheaper than the first

Most firms solve the same problem repeatedly because the answer sits in a closed file nobody can find. Lexcadence keeps precedents, clauses, research memos and closed-matter outcomes in one firm-scoped library, surfaces the ones that match the matter in front of you, and administers the file: stage board, matter-type checklist, attributed notes, and deadlines calculated from the rules.

See it in the portal Price it for my firm

Precedents and clauses, not a folder of documents

Firm text is stored as reusable clauses with matter tokens, tagged by practice area, jurisdiction and region. A lawyer lifts a clause into a draft instead of hunting for the last file that looked similar.

Memos that carry their sources

Every proposition in a research memo names the document and the page, clause or paragraph it came from, with the quoted passage. Verification takes seconds, which is the difference between usable research and a liability.

Retrieval you can argue with

Results are ranked on practice area, jurisdiction, region and matter-type tags, and each one shows why it surfaced. No opaque relevance score, and nothing learned from your files.

The file runs itself where it can

Opening a matter applies that matter type's checklist and calculates its deadlines from the triggering event — never from today — keeping the authority for each date. Stage changes, ticks and notes are attributed and logged.

Modules and pricing

Firm-wide list prices, so they are bought once rather than per practice area. Add them to any plan; platform seats are priced separately.

Firm Knowledge Vault

Standard · deterministic

Your precedents, clauses, playbooks and closed matters in one library, tagged by practice area, jurisdiction and region. Firm-scoped retrieval; your text never trains a third-party model.

—Searchable precedent and clause library
—Reusable clause text with matter tokens
—Closed-matter record with outcome

United States:: State-level tagging, with multi-state precedents marked region-neutral.
Canada:: Province-level tagging, and common-law and Québec civil-law material kept apart.

$249 / firm / month

United States · Canada

Similar Matter Retrieval

Advanced

Opens a file and shows what the firm already knows: prior matters of the same type and region, and the library entries that matched, with the reason each result surfaced.

—Ranked prior-matter list
—Match explanation per result
—Reliance recorded in the audit log

$349 / firm / month

or $12 per matterUnited States · Canada

Research Memo Workspace

Advanced

Research memos that carry their sources: every proposition names the document and the page, clause or paragraph it came from, so a lawyer verifies rather than trusts.

—Memo with source and locator per proposition
—Quoted passages
—Memo reuse count across matters

United States:: Federal and state authority cited separately; policy manuals cited by chapter and part.
Canada:: Federal and provincial statutes cited by section, with IRCC and CRA guidance kept distinct.

$399 / firm / month

or $89 per memoUnited States · Canada

Case Pipeline & Task Automation

Standard · deterministic

A matter pipeline by stage, with the checklist for that matter type applied automatically when the file opens, plus an attributed notes timeline. Deadlines are calculated from the triggering event, never from today.

—Stage board across the firm
—Per-matter-type checklist
—Attributed notes and stage history

$199 / firm / month

United States · Canada

Bundle

Firm Knowledge Suite

All four knowledge and case-administration modules, firm-wide, on top of your practice-area modules.

$999

per month + platform seats · list $1,196

Prices are product catalogue list prices for software modules. They are not legal fees and say nothing about what a firm charges its clients. Every output requires review and sign-off by a licensed lawyer.